К основному контенту

Books and their authors. The secret of Agatha Christie's enduring popularity.

Did you know that well over 2 billion copies of Agatha Christie's books are sold every year across the globe? No matter how ingenuous and relevant modern crime fiction authors try to be, none of them has been able to match Dame Agatha's massive popularity.

Read our post below to discover why her books have timeless appeal.

‘Reading Christie is like being taken for a pleasant garden tour by a gardener who really loves flowers and wants you to love them, too’, wrote James Zemboy, the author of ‘The Detective Novels Of Agatha Christie: A Reader's Guide’. It seems inconceivable that reading a murder mystery book could be compared to walking in a lovely garden but it can and there are a few reasons for it.

First of all, Agatha Christie avoided violence. She wrote: ‘I specialize in murders of quiet, domestic interest’. In her books you will never see a murder actually happen. Under no circumstances do her amateur sleuths, Poirot or Miss Marple, threaten anyone with a gun or inflict physical harm to others. The only weapons they use are their analytical brains and acute powers of observation. 
Moreover, Agatha Christie deliberately made her chief characters amusing. The first name of Poirot, a little Belgian with an egg-shaped head, a waxed moustache and small feet, is Hercule, the French version of Hercules. He is compulsively tidy, ‘arranging things, liking things in pairs, liking things square instead of round’. Miss Marple, ‘a spinster lady of uncertain age with plenty of time on her hands’, enjoys prying into other people’s life and calls herself ‘an emissary of justice’. Agatha Christie’s dislike of violence is also revealed through her choice of the murder method. In about 50% of her murder mysteries death is caused by poison. 
Hercule Poirot and Miss Marple

Secondly, Agatha Christie rarely modelled her characters on real people. She wrote: 'It's no good thinking about real people - you must create your characters for yourself. Someone you see in a tram or a train or in a restaurant is a possible starting point because you can make up something for yourself about them'. As a consequence, you are not likely to recognize yourself in any of the people populating her books. Besides, Christie made up her characters leaving a lot of scope for the reader's imagination- read and take pleasure in thinking up your own details for each character filling in the gaps left by the benevolent author.

Thirdly, Agatha Christie was a remarkably inventive writer and her inventiveness never fails to make the reader’s mind work. She was hardly ever content to rest on the laurels and introduced a number of new plot devices. In ‘The Murder of Roger Ackroyd’ she made the murderer someone who the readers of any book trust the most. It hits the reader like a thunderbolt to discover who is to blame but when the reader analyzes the facts, everything falls into place – strange but true. Another case in point is one of her most famous books ‘And Then There Were None’. That’s what she wrote about it:..‘a difficult technique which was a challenge and so I enjoyed it, and I think dealt with it satisfactorily.’ Indeed, in this book when the last person on an island cut off from the mainland is killed, the reader is amazed and is bound to ask the question: ‘If there is no one left, who is the murderer’? The answer is in the book, which is universally considered to be Christie’s masterpiece. 
Agatha Christie at work

Yet, when the riddle is explained, there are no feelings of anger, frustration or annoyance on the part of the reader. It seems so obvious that the reader inevitably thinks: I should have figured that out myself if I had been a little more attentive’. Thus, Christie’s books are like crossword puzzles – you often fail to complete them but you know that there is no cheating and if you try, you will succeed.

Комментарии

Популярные сообщения из этого блога

Commonly confused words: concept or conception?

For most of us happiness is the overriding aim in life but there is one formidable obstacle to achieving it – few of us have a clear CONCEPTION of what happiness is. For Socrates, a famous Greek philosopher, there was an inextricable link between a person’s well-being and knowledge.  You can become truly happy once you have rationally examined every aspect of your life and made sense of the world you live in. Socrates is supposed to have said: ‘The unexamined life is not worth living’. Rational examination of your life is all about CONCEPTS. For example, you have chosen the career of a judge in the hope of promoting justice. Whether your decisions as a judge will make you happy or not will hinge on how clearly you have formulated the CONCEPT of justice. However, the answer to the question ‘What is justice?’ may elude you. What method did Socrates suggest for defining CONCEPTS ? Socrates’s mother was a midwife – she helped women to give birth to babies. Socrates compared

Grammar spot. ARTICLES with nouns in apposition

Which is correct: The President Obama or President Obama? Lionel Messi, a first-class foorball player or  Lionel Messi, the first-class foorball player ? The writer Joanne Rowling or W riter Joanne Rowling?  Read our post to find it out.              Have you ever heard of George Bernard Shaw, THE IRISH PLAYWRIGHT? He wrote more than 50 plays including ‘Pygmalion’ and is the only man in history to be awarded both the Nobel Prize and an Oscar. Besides, he had a reputation for being a wit. Anecdotes abound featuring Shaw responding in an amusing and clever way to all sorts of situations he found himself in. Here are some of them: ANECDOTE 1 THE DANCER Isadora Duncan once wrote to George Bernard Shaw suggesting that they should have a child together: “Think of it!” she remarked. “With my body and your brains, what a wonder it would be.” “Yes,” Shaw replied. “But what if it had my body and your brains?” ISADORA DUNCAN ANECDOTE 2 Shaw decided to invite Winston Church

Grammar alert: Plurals of English nouns with Greek or Latin roots

Is ‘media’ singular or plural?  Would it be correct to say: Managerial excellence is an important criteria? Which plural should I use: referenda or referendums? Read our post below to find it out. There is a small group of nouns in English which are of Greek or Latin origin. For example: an analysis, a criterion, a stimulus.   These nouns still form plurals in the same way as they did in Latin or Greek. Let us focus on the most common nouns of this type and divide them into 5 groups. Group 1   -is [ ɪ s] ending in the singular      -es [i ː z] ending in the plural                a crisis                                       crises                an analysis                                 analyses Group 2   -on ending in the singular      - a ending in the plural                a criterion                                 criteria                a phenomenon                          phenomena Group 3   - um in the singular                   -a in t